The Next Generation of Scientists: The Development of a Model Intensive Research Experience for Undergraduates

Paul G. Stiles, Roger A. Boothroyd, Kathleen A. Moore, Catherine Batsche

Abstract


When undergraduates engage in hands-on research experiences, particularly intense mentored experiences, they are more likely to pursue graduate studies in the sciences and take a more assertive role in their learning and career activities. Such early career experiences have been identified as essential in the development of the next generation of researchers. The authors describe the decade long development, structure, and evaluation outcomes of a summer research experience for undergraduates designed to provide an intense, yet supportive, research experience that helps inspire the next generation of scientists. Future considerations for the program are also provided.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Batsche, C., Boothroyd, R., Gum, A., & Stiles, P. B. (2008). As they were taught: A case for the early mentoring of faculty. In C. A. Mullen (Ed). The handbook of formal mentoring in higher education: A case study approach. (pp. 85-102). Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon Publishers, Inc.

Brown, R.T., Daly, B.P., & Leong, F.T.L. (2009). Mentoring in research: A developmental approach. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40, 306-313. doi: 10.1037/a0011990

Chase, C.I. (1999). Contemporary assessment for educators. New York: Longman.

Cohen J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Routledge Academic.

Eagan, M. K., Hurtado, S., Chang, M. J., Garcia, G. A. Herrera, F. A., & Garibay, J. C. (2013). Making a difference in science education: The impact of undergraduate research programs. American Educational Research Journal, 50, 683-713. doi: 10.3102/0002831213482038.

Falconer, J., & Holcomb, D. (2008). Understanding undergraduate research experiences from the student perspective: A phenomenological study of a summer student research program. College Student Journal, 42, 869-878.

Gum, A., Mueller, K., Flink, D., Siraj, S., Batsche, C., Boothroyd, R., & Stiles, P. (2007). Evaluation of a Summer Research Institute in behavioral health for undergraduate students. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 34, 206-218. doi: 10.1007/s11414-007-9059-1.

Hathaway, R.S., Nagda, B., & Gregerman, S.R. (2002). The relationship of undergraduate research participation to graduate and professional education pursuit: An empirical study. Journal of College Student Development, 43, 614-631.

Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1959). Techniques for evaluating training programs. Journal of the American Society of Training Directors, 13, 3-9, 21-26.

Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1975). Techniques for Evaluating Programs. Parts 1, 2, 3 and 4. Evaluating training programs. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training and Development.

Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1994). Evaluating training programs: the four levels. San Francisco: Berret-Koehler.

Linn, M.C., Palmer, E., Baranger, A., Gerard, E., & Stone, E. (2015). Undergraduate research experiences: Impacts and opportunities. Science, 347, 1261757. DOI: 10.1126/science.1261757

Lopatto, D. (2007). Undergraduate research experiences support science career decisions and active learning. CBE – Life Sciences Education, 6, 297-306. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.07-06-0039

Lopatto, D. (2010). Undergraduate research as a high-impact student experience. Peer Review: AAC&U, 12, 27-30.

Medsker, K. L., & Roberts, D. G. (1992). ASTD trainer’s toolkit. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training and Development.

Mitchell, R. (1992). Testing for learning: How new approaches to evaluation can improve American schools. New York: The Free Press.

Morris, S. B., & DeShon, R. P. (2002). Combining effect size estimates in meta-analysis with repeated measures and independent-groups designs. Psychological Methods, 7, 105-125. DOI: 10.1037//1082-989X.7.1.105

National Advisory Mental Health Council Workgroup on Research Training (NAMHC). (2008). Investing in the Future. Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Mental Health. Accessed at: https://www.nimh.nih.gov/about/advisory-boards-and-groups/namhc/reports/investing-in-the-future_42525.pdf

Page, M.C., Abramson, C.I., & Jacobs-Lawson, J.M. (2004). The National Science Foundation Research Experiences for Undergraduates Program: Experiences and recommendations. Teaching of Psychology, 31, 241-247.

Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. W. Tyler, R. M. Gagne, & M. Scriven (Eds.), Perspectives of curriculum evaluation. (pp. 39–83). Chicago: Rand McNally.

Stiggins, R. J. (1987). The design and development of performance assessments. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 6, 33-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.1987.tb00507.x

Stiles, P. G., Batsche, C., Gum, A., & Boothroyd, R. A. (2007). Risk management through the training of undergraduates in research ethics. Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly, 27, 153-157.

Taraban, R., & Logue, E. (2012). Academic factors that affect undergraduate research experiences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 499-514. doi: 10.1037/a0026851




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/irhe.v4n1p45

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


International Research in Higher Education  ISSN 2380-9183 (Print)  ISSN 2380-9205 (Online)

Copyright © Sciedu Press

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add ‘sciedupress.com’ domain to your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', please check your 'spam' or 'junk' folder.