Exploring Students' Perspective on University Exit Exam

Abstract

The University Exit Exam is a pivotal assessment for graduating students, yet its effectiveness and relevance are subject of debate. This study investigates architectural engineering students' perspectives on the University Exit Exam at United Arab Emirates University (UAEU) to better understand its impact and identify areas for improvement. Responses were obtained from 26 architectural engineering students through a survey questionnaire comprising both structured and open-ended responses. The responses reveal mixed perceptions regarding the University Exit Exam. While the majority (53.8%) remained neutral, 34.6% agreed that passing the exit exam had a positive impact on their careers. This was primarily attributed to the method of implementing the exam, with a majority (76.9%) indicating a preference for a pass/fail system over a grading system. Over 70 % participants reported some level of stress when higher stake in terms of grades is allocated to the exit exam. It is suggested to rationalize the assessments along with supportive preparatory materials to alleviate anxiety and improve exam relevance. The findings can help improve the design and administration of University Exit Exams by addressing students' perspectives, concerns, and incorporating recommendations. This can enhance exam effectiveness and relevance, leading to improved educational outcomes benefiting both the academia and the professional sphere.